I pulled the active project memory. Current high-priority lanes are The Vicente as the first workflow lab, Drew Park RFQ triage, funding-source validation, and proposal package structure. I recommend separating opportunity fit, creative capacity, and funding mechanics before drafting anything external.

From Jason's creative lane: Drew Park is useful if the scope allows visible portfolio-building work and production logistics are clear. For The Vicente, exterior-facing mural or lobby/common-area art can become strong proof if we define surfaces, budget tier, timeline, and artist fit early.

From Shalimar's lane: keep Tampa 1% language caveated. The Vicente should be framed as a CRA/community/funder/corridor-value opportunity, not a mandatory art compliance claim. Funding route needs source verification before client-facing language.

I can draft a partner-review note summarizing opportunity fit, funding caveats, creative proof needed, and next questions. I will route it to Approval Queue before any email or developer-facing message is sent.